Whole Watershed FAQ
Whole Watershed Fund sources can supply up to 50% of the project implementation. The remaining funding can be from any source (federal, local, private, state) that is not associated with the six Whole Watershed Fund sources identified in the Whole Watershed Act.
Project sponsors and their partners should determine the full cost of implementation and utilize Whole Watershed for 50% of the project implementation cost.
Cash match is preferred but in-kind contributions are also eligible to meet match requirements.
After projects are selected, the State Management Team will develop an implementation and finance plan that will stipulate the requirements for match documentation.
No, nutrient credits generated through the trading program are not eligible as match.
Only if the funds are supporting implementation as the Whole Watershed Fund can only provide up to 50% of the project implementation costs.
Yes, federal funds are eligible for match.
No, state sources are eligible for match provided they are not the funding sources within the Whole Watershed Program. Those Whole Watershed Fund sources are: Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Bays Trust Fund, Bay Restoration Fund, Clean Water Commerce Act, Waterway Improvement Fund, Maryland Agricultural Cost Share Program, and Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Fund.
The intent of the Whole Watershed Program is to provide one funding opportunity that encompasses a wide range of environmental outcomes to achieve shallow water habitat improvement. Each watershed will need one project sponsor to be the entity responsible for administering a project (project is defined as a collection of restoration and conservation actions coordinated by multiple entities), including accounting for funds, coordinating partners and actions and reporting on outcomes. This means that the project sponsor can develop a partnership where they receive implementation funds for actions, subaward that implementation funding to another entity, or use a combination of both. Thus, yes, all funding requests could be sub-awarded to your partners.
Page 17 of the RFP states that actions that were implemented prior to July 1, 2025 are not eligible as a match. An active construction project is considered implementation and is not eligible for match. Adaptive management and/or maintenance is post-implementation thus projects undergoing adaptive management or maintenance are also not eligible for match. The intent is that only new implementation/projects that begin after July 1, 2025 are eligible as match.
There is no funding ceiling or floor, but the six funding programs within the Whole Watershed Fund can only account for up to half of the total project implementation costs. Ex - if the full suite of actions, aka the project, is $6M then the Whole Watershed Fund can only provide up to $3M. Project sponsors and their partners should identify the actual costs required to implement the project. A project proposal is not required to have matching funds secured as the project sponsor and partners will work with the State Management Team to develop an implementation and finance plan.
The act does not specify a total funding amount for the Whole Watershed Program or a funding amount per state funding source. The only annual spending directed within the act is set at $20k to support the project sponsors. The RFP has some requirements for that $20k. Each project (MD 8 digit watershed) will have a unique cost dependent on the specific and number of practices/actions implemented. The types (sector, landownership, design elements, etc.) of practices/actions will dictate the funding source utilized by the Whole Watershed Program. This means the amount spent on the program will be determined by the awarded project details, not the other way around.
A project proposal is not required to have matching funds secured as the project sponsor and partners will work with the State Management Team to develop an implementation and finance plan.
Funding for planned projects may be requested from the Whole Watershed Fund or may be used as match, however, only projects that will be implemented after July 1, 2025 are eligible as grant funding and match.
Yes, but only one project sponsor per watershed will be selected for funding.
Proposals may come from different sponsors from within the same watershed. However, only one project sponsor per watershed will be selected for funding.
If there are multiple project proposals in a watershed that would be stronger together, they could be combined into a single project and single grant, if they agree. The webinar on November 7, 2024 may serve as an opportunity to meet and collaborate if that helps their proposal.
If your proposal is not selected for the Whole Watershed Program it does not become ineligible to receive Grants Gateway funding or MACS funding.
No, receiving Whole Watershed Act funding does not influence DNR Grants Gateway funding or other state funding.
The State Management Team is not selecting the 8 digit watersheds. Proposals are submitted for actions within a MD 8 digit watershed and projects will be selected from that candidate list.
Just the census tracts where the project(s) are located
MACS cost-share funding is available up to 100% for individual agricultural Best Management Practices consistent with existing program eligibility requirements. The 1:1 match is applied to the entire project implementation costs, not individual BMPs. Applicants can determine how they utilize Whole Watershed funding to implement projects and their associated action.
A county or municipality is an eligible project sponsor.
There is an upload feature within the application that you may use to provide additional details.
The RFP states that the funding mechanism details include: "For each line item above, indicate the funding mechanism requested from the Whole Watershed Fund: reimbursable grant, pay-for-performance contract, upfront lump sum, etc." We recognize the application format is confusing and we edited the application for the budget and narrative fields to be an upload. Follow the guidance and table within the RFP when developing those files.
Please include plans to collaborate with a school program, like Envirothon for example, in the project proposal. The meetings for the SMT to discuss implementation of the project and funding plans will not involve the same audiences the proposal may intend for community outreach.
Selection of project watersheds for Whole Watershed does not affect ability for other watersheds to apply for MACS.
No, this is not an update to the WIP, but the BMPs completed through any approved project proposals will count towards the existing WIP goals for all sectors. Whole Watershed Act Program is a Maryland effort, an update to our Watershed Implementation Plans or what comes next for Beyond 2025 is a watershed-wide decision to be made by the Bay Program Partnership.
Federal lands are eligible for implementation provided the existing Whole Watershed Fund source (the 6 mentioned above) allow funds to be implemented on federal land. Thus it is dependent on the source fund restrictions.
Public Feedback
Proposal Abstracts
1) ShoreRivers - Upper Choptank
The Upper Choptank Whole Watershed Project uses a holistic approach to rapidly improve local water quality conditions in the Upper Choptank River. Led by partners involved in the Envision the Choptank collaborative, the project identifies four predominantly agricultural focal areas to target investment in management practices across farmland, and address stormwater, wastewater, and habitat concerns with local governments and disenfranchised communities at a scale capable of showing water quality improvement. A defining feature of the project is involving individuals and groups who work with project partners to co-create solutions to problems of mutual interest. The community-based approach leverages local concern and motivation to accelerate implementation of durable restoration actions that range from in-field and edge-of-field practices on farms, to septic, sewer, green infrastructure, and wildlife habitat enhancements in communities and neighborhoods. Modeled practice efficiencies inform investment decisions during the planning phase, and robust field monitoring verifies results after projects are completed.
2) Coastal Bays - Newport Bay
Newport Bay watershed is varied in both landscapes and people. It contains extensive marshes, farms, forests, and towns, while encompassing the most diverse community in the Coastal Bays. This comprehensive watershed restoration addresses 1) the need for enhanced stormwater management through nature-based stream and wetland restoration 2) sea level rise and salt marsh deterioration through marsh restoration 3) agricultural runoff through outreach to farmers for conservation practices, and 4) wastewater pollution by connecting septic systems to public sewer. Ayres Creek and Trappe Creek are the largest tributaries to Newport Bay and will be focal points within the watershed due to their contributions of excess nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment from the urban/suburban parts of the watershed downstream. Newport Bay consistently scores the lowest out of the five Coastal Bays in the annual Maryland Coastal Bays Report Card, which assesses the health of the bays using four water quality indicators (nitrogen, phosphorus, chlorophyll a, dissolved oxygen) and two biotic indicators (seagrass, hard clam). This multi-year restoration effort will address the key issues causing Newport Bay to be the unhealthiest of the Coastal Bays and specifically aims to improve water quality to restore shallow water habitat.
3) Gunpowder Valley Conservancy - Prettyboy Reservoir
The Prettyboy Reservoir Watershed is the cold-water headwaters to Prettyboy Reservoir that drains predominantly agricultural areas in Baltimore and Carroll Counties as well as the headwater in York County, Pennsylvania. This Whole Watershed collaboration will be led by the Gunpowder Valley Conservancy, a non-profit community organization whose mission is to engage, connect, and inspire people to preserve and restore the Gunpowder Watershed that includes the Prettyboy Reservoir. This program will bring together municipal and agricultural agencies with community groups to collaborate on cost-effective and science-based solutions to meet common goals of improving water quality in impaired streams, improving fisheries and wildlife habitat, and addressing environmental justice and climate resiliency. This coalition of knowledge, expertise, and resources will be able to bring real and measurable improvements to the valuable natural resources of the watershed.
4) Southern MD Resource Conservation and Development Board - Lower Patuxent River
Across the Lower Patuxent Watershed, communities recognize the need to improve water quality as part of building resilience in the region. The goals of this project are to expand on existing entities to build a collaboration infrastructure for coordination, integration, and aggregation of outcome-driven actions that would promote innovative, science-based solutions to waterway restoration efforts in the Lower Patuxent River and surrounding watershed and would inject new energy and investment in the implementation of the Patuxent River Policy Plan and the work of the Patuxent River Commission. The project will address ongoing water quality, habitat, and climate change issues while providing multiple restoration and conservation benefits, expanding equitable access to conservation resources, and enhancing climate resilience.
5) Washington College - Langford Creek
Washington College, ShoreRivers, Eastern Shore Land Conservancy, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Horn Point Laboratory, Orchard Point Oyster Co., and The Nature Conservancy—together now known as The Langford Watershed Alliance—propose innovative and comprehensive restoration and monitoring efforts throughout Langford Creek Watershed. A tributary of the Chester River, this small and predominantly agricultural watershed struggles to meet water quality standards for nutrients, bacteria, and sediment. To restore Langford Creek, our Alliance will (1) utilize innovative best management practices (BMPs) to accelerate water quality improvements, (2) implement farm scale precision mapping for targeted BMPs installations, (3) restore nearshore habitat with native grass, wetlands, stream restoration practices and forests to support wildlife, (4) increase use of targeted in-field agricultural best practices, such as no till, cover crops, targeted fertilizer application, in areas prone to stormwater runoff, (5) rebuild and protect oyster and Submerged Aquatic Vegetation habitat, (6) install living shorelines to protect against erosion and provide increased incentives for landowners and farm operators for implementation of innovative practices, (7) identify and remediate sources of bacteria through septic remediation upgrades, (8) engage in boater education to reduce wave action, and (9) establish monitoring stations throughout the watershed to track progress. This innovative and holistic restoration of Langford Creek Watershed will serve as a model for future projects Bay wide, and we cannot do this work alone. Local communities, governments, and industries will help to guide our work to ensure the result is authentically informed by and for the communities who treasure Langford Creek the most.
6) South Baltimore Gateway Partnership - Baltimore Harbor
The Middle Branch Resiliency Initiative (“MBRI”) is a coordinated suite of nature-based infrastructure actions around the highly urban shoreline of the Middle Branch of the Patapsco River, within the Baltimore Harbor Watershed. The MBRI is the shoreline restoration arm of Reimagine Middle Branch (“RMB”), a community-driven environmental justice initiative working to restore approximately 11 miles of shoreline along the Middle Branch of the Patapsco River. The MBRI leverages and intersects with the RMB framework and local programs designed to engage community members and local stakeholders in restoration efforts, including the RMB Committees (detailed in the Partner Engagement Plan), the Chesapeake Watershed Restoration
Academy workforce development program, research collaborations, and community engagement and programming.
MBRI actions will improve water quality; increase riparian and aquatic habitat function, value, and diversity; reduce risk of coastal hazards and impacts of climate change; restore public access to enhanced waterfront greenspace; improve public health and welfare; and actively engage community members in the stewardship of their environment, ensuring that legacy residents are the primary beneficiaries of all improvements. This Project is in the Middle Branch of the Patapsco River, the area that continues to experience the worst environmental injustices in the Baltimore Harbor Watershed. Developed over four years of community engagement through the RMB planning process, actions under the MBRI include shoreline stabilization, habitat restoration, stormwater management, flood risk reduction, recreational access improvements, and community engagement within historically underserved communities in South Baltimore.
7) Resilience Authority of Annapolis and Anne Arundel County - Severn River
The Severn River, a 14-mile tidal estuary in Anne Arundel County, Maryland, is a critical tributary of the Chesapeake Bay. Its 81-square-mile watershed supports diverse aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems but faces challenges due to urban development and environmental degradation. To address these issues, the Severn Engagement and Vital Ecosystem Restoration Network (The SEVERN) adopts a whole watershed approach that integrates innovative, nature-based restoration and conservation practices with robust, targeted community outreach and engagement. The SEVERN emphasizes the restoration of shallow water habitats, wetlands, and shorelines to enhance ecosystem resilience, support productive fisheries, and improve habitat for key species. By aligning efforts with the recommendations of leading Chesapeake Bay scientists, The SEVERN demonstrates scalable, science-based solutions to regional ecological challenges. Through dynamic partnerships among local citizens, businesses, non-governmental organizations, and watershed groups, The SEVERN exemplifies the collaborative spirit envisioned in the 2014 Chesapeake Bay Agreement and Maryland’s Whole Watershed Act. This approach not only strengthens the Severn River’s ecosystem but also fosters community resilience to climate hazards, setting a precedent for localized, impactful Chesapeake Bay restoration efforts.
8) The Nature Conservancy - Anacostia
Anacostia Watershed Restoration Partnership will bring together a diverse group of partners from the governmental, non-profit, private, and academic sectors with the common goal of a healthier Anacostia Watershed for the river and its surrounding communities. The watershed, home to over 800,000 people, 43 fish species, and 200 bird species, has been heavily urbanized, losing 6,500 acres of wetlands and 70% of its forest cover due to over 25% impervious surface cover increase. The communities in the watershed face significant economic challenges, including low employment rates, high poverty rates, and poor health indicators. This proposal focuses on Sligo Creek and the Northwest Branch to improve conditions for underserved communities, enhancing collaboration among Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, and the District of Columbia. Projects under this proposal include green infrastructure, stormwater management facilities, innovative technology integration, tree and native habitat planting, community education, workforce development, and community outreach, supported by a robust monitoring plan to demonstrate the impact of this collaborative effort and the team’s long-standing history of environmental work in the region.
9) Catoctin Land Trust - Antietam Creek
The Antietam Creek Restoration Collaborative (ACRC) consists of Federal, State, Local and nonprofit partners working together to identify, design, and implement BMP’s, throughout the watershed in a predominantly agricultural setting with underserved, overburdened communities in rural areas as well as cities such as Hagerstown, MD and Waynesboro, PA. Partners will conduct community outreach and implement conservation practices to improve water quality and quantity with the goal of delisting stream segments from the dirty waters list with restoration practices such as: urban tree plantings, riparian forest buffers, cattle stream exclusion fencing, row crop conversion to pasture, stormwater management, and stream restoration to provide boat access and in-stream fisheries habitat for recreation. The Heart of Maryland Collaborative will convene project partners quarterly, coordinating community outreach and documenting conservation implementation to reach the project's goal. Many of the ACRC partners have been working together off and on since 2005 when a Maryland watershed group, Beaver Creek Watershed Association and the Antietam Watershed Association in Pennsylvania convened the four Bishops leading the Washington MD & Franklin County PA Mennonite Church, as this community owns or leases 60 percent of the farmland in the Antietam Creek watershed. ACRC will reunite and expand this partnership crossing state boundaries to take a true Whole Watershed approach for water quality, biodiversity and community resilience.