|
Frequently Asked
Questions
(FAQs)
|
|
|
Q: What
is the Tributary Strategy Program and how does it relate to the Tributary
Teams? Q: How
long has this program been operational? Q: Why
was this program created? At the multi-state Chesapeake Bay watershed-wide level, the Tributary Strategies fulfilled the commitments of the 1992 Amendment to the 1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement to develop Strategies (or plans) to achieve a 40% reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus loadings. It was signed by the Governors from states within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed including Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, the District of Columbia and the US Environmental Protection Agency. At the local level, public participation, local knowledge, and "buy-in" by stakeholders throughout the watershed is crucial to the success of the entire Bay restoration effort. This program provides a forum and supports public involvement in water quality restoration, decision-making, policy discussions, and other activities. The establishment of a strong, multi-jurisdictional, public outreach and partnership component in the state's nutrient reduction efforts has been accomplished through Maryland's Tributary Strategy Teams. While the "official" membership of the teams is 350, many other stakeholders have been encouraged to participate informally. An estimated 700 people throughout the watershed are kept abreast of the Team's activities. Q: What
are the specific activities and operations of the program? Each of the 10 teams meets monthly in their watersheds. The teams are: Upper Potomac, Middle Potomac, Lower Potomac, Upper Eastern Shore, Choptank, Lower Eastern Shore, Upper Western Shore, Patapsco / Back River, Patuxent River, and the Lower Western Shore. Meetings may include special briefings from agency representatives, guest speakers, field trips, discussions, or work group sessions which focus on point sources, agricultural, developing lands, urban, or other issues. The Chairs and Vice Chairs of the ten Teams meet bi-annually with the Governor's Chesapeake Bay Cabinet, which consists of Secretaries of the Departments of Natural Resources, Environment, Agriculture, Planning, Transportation and the Dean of the School of Agriculture from the University of Maryland. At these meetings, Tributary Team Chairs and Vice Chairs have an opportunity to bring new issues forward, highlight areas of concern, and request special assistance. Outcome: Team Chairs requested special support to form a task force that would explore the impacts of septic systems, their management, and the impacts that septic systems have on the state's nutrient loads. A broad based stakeholder group was convened, including experts from health departments, operators, installers, businesses, state agency regulatory representatives, and tributary team members. This On Site Sewage Disposal Task Force developed recommendations that were subsequently presented to the Bay Cabinet and the Governor. Legislation was submitted by the Maryland Department of the Environment as a result of this task forces' work. Please refer to OSDS Task Force Report for more information. The Chairs and Vice Chairs meet annually with the Governor to discuss major issues of concern and seek the Governors' support. The Governor also has the opportunity to request support from team members. Outcome: In 2000 the Teams recommended that the Governor take action to reduce the state's reliance on fossil fuels and set an example for the design, construction and management of energy efficient buildings. In March 2001, through Tributary Team and state government efforts, Governor Glendening issued an Executive Order establishing a 6% green energy procurement goal for all state energy purchases and new policies addressing the way state government designs, constructs, and manages for energy efficiency in their facilities. Chairs and Vice Chairs from each team meet quarterly to steer the overall direction of the Program. Local government representatives on each team also meet quarterly to discuss issues of interest or concern, or to receive important updates. Outcome: Recently, Team members who represent local governments helped update the state's Chesapeake Bay Local Government Partnership Agreement. It was signed at a ceremony in June 2000 by all the local government executives. In this Agreement, Maryland's local governments again committed to participate in the Tributary Strategy Program, to support efforts that restore the tributaries and the Chesapeake Bay, and to help in updating the new Tributary Strategies that will guide Maryland's efforts to reduce nutrient and sediment pollution and restore habitat. Teams also conduct public awareness campaigns (Wade In, Fish In, or Dip In) in each of the 10 watersheds to inform local citizens about the quality of waters in their neighborhoods. See attached flyer. Several "Cross-Team" Workgroups have formed to focus more extensively on particular issues as they relate to Developed Lands, Point Sources, and Public Education. These groups usually meet quarterly. Outcome: An example of the Public Education Cross- Team Workgroup effort includes "Fragile-Handle With Care", a 40 page document that was distributed in the Baltimore Sun as an insert in their Sunday paper. This document teaches homeowners about personal responsibility regarding nutrient pollution. It has an accompanying teachers guide which was distributed to over 400 schools in the region. This year, a new document, "Picture Maryland: Where Do We Grow From Here" (www.picturemaryland.net), focuses on sprawl development. This was published and distributed on Earth Day. Q: Why
is this program a new and creative approach or method? Public participation in the Maryland's Tributary Strategy Program has enabled state government to engender trust, increase communication, build relationships, and most importantly build support for common water quality goals. This program empowers stakeholders by giving them direct and frequent access to the Governor of Maryland, the Governor's Bay Cabinet, and to key state agency representatives who are responsible for policies and regulations. Q: What
was the program's start up costs? Q: What
is the annual operating costs of this program? In addition to staff, each tributary team has one state agency representative as a team member on their team. These representatives are not supported by the Program's direct budget. State agencies participating in the Tributary Strategy Program have committed to fulfilling the Chesapeake Bay Agreement, which obligates their support in the Tributary Strategy development and implementation. Participating state agencies are responsible for these costs. Q: How
is this program funded? Q: How
many state employees work with this program? All twenty-four local governments throughout the state are participants on the Tributary Strategy Teams. Other participants and stakeholders include representatives from agriculture (farmers, Maryland Farm Bureau, Soil Conservation Districts, United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service), waterman, private business representatives, public educators, scientists, citizens, non profit organizations, local and federal government representatives, and developers. Q: Did
this program require the passage of legislation, executive order or
regulations? Q: What
equipment, technology and software are used to operate and administer
this program? Q: Did
this program originate in Maryland? Q: Has
the program been fully implemented? Q: How
effective is the program in addressing the defined problems or issues? Team members participated on task forces, in policy formation, and were instrumental in the development of a recent Executive Order on Green Power, Energy Efficiency, and Green Buildings. The Teams participated in hands-on activities such as building oyster bars, planting trees, and conducting public awareness campaigns. They have mastered the art of developing partnerships; working with the Baltimore Sun newspaper to develop and distribute their educational materials to over one million people. Team members gave presentations at public meetings and clubs, testified before the legislature, and met with local elected and state officials. Their charge to reduce nutrient pollution led them to focus on stormwater management, septic systems, and federal and state pollution prevention programs. Please refer to their 1998 and 1999 Annual Reports for your review. Reducing nutrient pollution is an enormous task. Almost every human-based activity generates nutrient pollution and the broad scope of the Teams' work reflects this wide-ranging impact. For Maryland, it is only through such a collaborative, far-reaching program, such as the Tributary Strategy Program, and its public outreach component & the Tributary Strategy Teams, that the state is able to accomplish this enormous task. Q: How
has the program grown and or changed since its inception? |
|
| Search Maryland DNR Restoration and Protection
| Bay Grasses | Harmful
Algae | Bay Monitoring Return to the Maryland
DNR Home Page |
|